Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Babic

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 15:41, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Dan Babic]]=

:{{la|Dan Babic}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dan_Babic Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Dan Babic}})

Many sources which on closer look seem to boil down to very little actually. His role as host of "Design Genius" has received no attention in reliable independent sources, his role in the Degeneres show was the recipient of a cheque because he suffered from leukemia and only got a passing mention, and none of the other roles seem to have gotten more attention than this. The Geelong coast magazine is the only indepth source, but as a single, low quality source (an ad-packed local magazine) isn't sufficient. The image may need scrutiny as well, as this "March 2017 own work" photo is the same as the one used in the 2016 Geelong source.

Anyway, fails WP:BIO. Fram (talk) 14:04, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 14:26, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 14:26, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:10, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

I just verified all the sources. Great, honest article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Portialloyd (talkcontribs) 23:01, 17 May 2017 (UTC) Note: I moved this comment to the bottom where it belongs. —KuyaBriBriTalk 00:20, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

:Note: Portialloyd is the creator of this article and has edited nothing but Babic related things here. Fram (talk) 06:55, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

  • Delete A non trivial handful but of essentially mostly minor references, does not meet WP:GNG. If anything WP:TOOSOON. Aoziwe (talk) 11:21, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:41, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

  • Delete as NN. That the article is true, well-written, and nice do not matter. Bearian (talk) 01:21, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.