Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Bertram (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:01, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Dan Bertram]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Bertram}}

:{{la|Dan Bertram}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dan_Bertram_(2nd_nomination) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Dan Bertram}})

NN local businessman, fails WP:BIO and the GNG going away. The only sources in the article namedrop him and quote him, but are not about him, or discuss him in any significant detail, as the GNG requires. Earlier AfD was on an unrelated hockey player. Ravenswing 10:36, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 11:16, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 11:16, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Delete a local real estate developer. I think this is a different Dan Bertram than the one on whom the other article was.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:59, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:52, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Delete - I concur with the above statement that while the (few) cited references mention this person, they are not really about him - it seems that they only give passing mention of him. Vorbee (talk) 16:28, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 03:10, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.