Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Sileo

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. AfD is not for cleanup. The Bushranger One ping only 01:29, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

=[[Dan Sileo]]=

:{{la|Dan Sileo}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dan_Sileo Stats])

:({{Find sources|Dan Sileo}})

This is a negatively unsourced BLP. The subject has had problems with content of the article. WP:COATRACK v/r - TP 00:25, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

  • Keep passes WP:ATHLETE playing in the NFL for one season, WP:GNG for a wide variety of reasons, and someone who calls himself [https://twitter.com/DanSileoShow America's Most Controversial Sports Talk Show Host], yes some of that criticism is warrantied. The article is a WP:BLP mess however, and I really don't know where to start with cleaning up the article, maybe a WP:TNT is in order here. Secret account 05:49, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Keep. Former professional American football player who appeared in ten NFL games (see [http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/S/SileDa20.htm Pro-Football-Reference.com]); therefore, subject is entitled to a presumption of notability per WP:NGRIDIRON. I also agree with Secret's assessment above that this article is a BLP disaster consisting mostly of unverified statements about a living person; unless substantiated, most of the existing content should be temporarily removed. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 06:08, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
  • keep but the unsourced material should be stricken per BLP concerns. The article is a mess in its current state. Cbl62 (talk) 09:16, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Keep clearly passes WP:NSPORTS and WP:GNG standards. All other issues noted are for editing and not deletion of the article.--Paul McDonald (talk) 14:40, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.