Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dance technology

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Lenticel ^(talk) 02:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

=[[Dance technology]]=

:{{la|Dance technology}} ([{{fullurl:Dance technology|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dance technology}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Original research, unmaintained for years. And don't let the long list of weblinks confuse you. While the term is searchable in google, what is found is not what article says: it is not a "new art form", in some refs it is simply usage of modern tecnologies for presentation of dance, see, eg. [http://www.maricopa.edu/academic/ccta/programs/sc/sc5979c066.doc here]. Note - I do not say that there cannot be an article with this title: it is just the current content is original unsupported definition of the term by the (basically sole) author, who left wikipedia long time ago. - 7-bubёn >t 19:48, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Delete Yeah, that looks right. - Eldereft (cont.) 23:11, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:04, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Delete Rubbish. However did people manage to dance without all this technology? pablo_hablo. 00:15, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete as a spamfield. Alexius08 (talk) 02:28, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Delete per nom. ArcAngel (talk) 06:40, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.