Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dancer (software)
=[[Dancer (software)]]=
:{{la|Dancer (software)}} – (
:({{findsources|Dancer (software)}})
Non-notable software. Ekerazha (talk) 11:34, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Ekerazha (talk) 11:38, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- Comment The anonymous user 188.25.194.157 removed the "notability" tag and insulted me on my talk page. Ekerazha (talk) 11:46, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Totally non-notable. De728631 (talk) 16:51, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- Delete- Non-notable software,does not need an article on Wikipedia.It's interesting that 188.25.194.157's only edits are the ones that Ekerazha mentioned and one edit to another article on programming, in which they undid an edit. Dinosaur Dan1 (talk) 21:54, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- Personally I don't believe it to be non-notable, or I would not have taken the time to write the article. Dancer is an actively-developed and used framework; with up to 20 developers committing, and over 100 watchers on Github, I think that illustrates that it's a notable project and not just someone's own little pet project which nobody else uses. I tried to make the article as non-subjective as possible, drawing inspiration from the article on Catalyst, another Perl framework. How do you make the distinction between notable and not notable, anyway? Bigpresh (talk) 09:13, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- It should have multiple, reliable sources, as per WP:GNG. Ekerazha (talk) 10:29, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
- I have added some other sources referencing Dancer; do you consider those acceptable, or would you like to see still more? Bigpresh (talk) 12:39, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.