Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dandelion Books

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:18, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

=[[Dandelion Books]]=

:{{la|Dandelion Books}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dandelion Books}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|Dandelion Books}})

Notability is very tenuous. None of the books published by this organization appear to be notable; ergo, the company likely is not notable either. A quick Google search ([http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy&hl=en&q=dandelion+books&aq=f&aqi=g4g-o1&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=&pbx=1&fp=444d6326654cadfa]) shows that the only sources that have written about this company are its own official website (of course) as well as several FRINGE websites, such as that of Israel Shamir. None of the sources appear to be reliable, or sufficient to establish notability. Neither the Southern Poverty Law Center nor the Anti-Defamation League has commented on the subject, nor have any mainstream news outlets. Anti-Semitic, yes. Notable, no. Stonemason89 (talk) 16:37, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Delete The secondary sources do not even mention the company. -Steve Dufour (talk) 22:23, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:43, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.