Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Magilow
=[[Daniel Magilow]]=
:{{la|Daniel Magilow}} ([{{fullurl:Daniel Magilow|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Magilow}}&action=delete}} delete]) –
Some searches indicate he fails WP:PROF. If kept, the article could do with fewer capital letters (usually reserved for resumes). Biruitorul Talk 03:49, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly not yet notable. DGG (talk) 04:19, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —John Z (talk) 22:53, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. On his way perhaps, but far from notable just now. --Crusio (talk) 23:17, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Could not find enough to establish notability under WP:PROF. Does not seem to pass WP:BIO either. Being a book series editor is probably not enough to meet WP:PROF criterion #8 (editor-in-chief of established journal).--Eric Yurken (talk) 01:12, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. There is more information from the University of Tennessee at Knoxville (via Google cache): [http://209.85.229.132/search?q=cache:ABxUR4yzGQwJ:web.utk.edu/~mfll/german/people/bios/magilow.html+%22Daniel+Magilow%22&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=uk] which confirms he is an assistant professor at the beginning of his career. Google Scholar finds few or no citations for his works.[http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?num=50&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q=%22DH+Magilow%22&btnG=Search] Book reviews editor of an academic journal is not equivalent to Editor-in-Chief. I can find no evidence that the subject meets WP:PROF at this time. Espresso Addict (talk) 13:15, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete In my opinion, fails to meet either WP:PROF or WP:BIO. Tim Ross (talk) 21:40, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.