Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Winter

:{{la|Daniel Winter}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Daniel_Winter Stats])

:({{Find sources|Daniel Winter}})

DePRODED by another user with a recommendation for AfD. Concern was: Although the article may demonstrate importance, researches have not revealed sufficient third party reliable sources to establish Wikipedia criteria for notability at WP:CREATIVE. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:07, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:18, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:18, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

• Delete. Fails WP:AUTHOR, WP:BK, and WP:BIO. Qworty (talk) 21:14, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
• Keep, make into a disambig page with Daniel Winter (Orangeman). JASpencer (talk) 22:19, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

:— Note to closing admin: JASpencer (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 03:33, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:27, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

---

• Delete - books are self promotion, citation is a court case, parts read like an ad, and clearly fails WP:BIO. Jrcrin001 (talk) 07:00, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
• Delete. Not supported by any acceptable sources. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:18, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.