Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Silk

=[[Danny Silk]]=

:{{la|Danny Silk}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Silk}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Danny Silk}})

Not enough reliable, third party coverage to justify a separate article for this person. Fails WP:BIO/WP:N. Another article in a similar situation as this one (pastor at the same church) is Kris Vallotton which I also nom'd for AFD. Killiondude (talk) 00:30, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

::Those are not valid reasons to keep an article. Reasons need to policy based. Articles need to comply with policies. Sean.hoyland - talk 04:41, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.