Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Verdun-Wheeler

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. TigerShark (talk) 22:09, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

=[[Danny Verdun-Wheeler]]=

:{{la|Danny Verdun-Wheeler}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Danny Verdun-Wheeler}})

Fails WP:Athlete. Never appeared in a professional game and didnt have a notable college career Yankees10 01:49, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

  • Keep but not for anything in the article as it currently stands. Google News shows a large number of references, many far beyond routine coverage of a college athlete. There is more than enough independent reliable sources to support notability under WP:GNG, they just need to be placed in the article. That is an editing issue and not a deletion issue (by the way, the three sources provided all go to busted weblinks).--Paul McDonald (talk) 20:07, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete he has passing mentions in articles much like anyone good enough to get a pro tryout. He only played in the preseason. Fails WP:ATHLETE, IMO.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 20:49, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete I didn't find anything that would really make him notable. Subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NSPORT.--Giants27(T|C) 02:26, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CharlieEchoTango (talk) 18:37, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 02:09, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.