Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dansk Jernbane

:{{la|Dansk Jernbane}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dansk_Jernbane Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Dansk Jernbane}})

I'm not Danish so I hope we can get some insight into this possibly non-notable company that has existed since July 2006 (basically the same content) and, at best, this could be mentoned at CFL's article (the Dansk article was moved to CFL Cargo [https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/CFL_Cargo here] as well). To the best of my abilities, I searched for sources and found nothing good. Notifying tagger {{U|Davey2010}}. SwisterTwister talk 07:36, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

• Merge into Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Luxembourgeois per nom - Judging by this [http://www.cfl.lu/espaces/fret/en/group/structure/rail/cfl-cargo-danmark/] they were merged into CFL Cargo (I'm assuming the Merger happened in 2006?), Seeing as the "Dansk Jembane" DK wiki article redirects to [https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/CFL_Cargo CFL Cargo] we may aswell follow suit, I did a few sources [http://www.dagbladet.no/2013/01/14/nyheter/politikk/journalistikk/danmark/utenriks/25231527/][http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/iriks/Dansk-loft-for-jernbanen-blir-ikke-kopiert-i-Norge--7459656.html][http://politiken.dk/indland/politik/ECE2252603/transportministeren-laegger-ic4-togene-i-graven/][http://politiken.dk/debat/debatindlaeg/ECE2025225/lokomotivfoerer-vi-bliver-presset-til-at-koere-paa-kanten-af-det-ansvarlige/][http://politiken.dk/indland/politik/ECE2089960/radikale-i-brat-afvisning-af-enhedslistens-kritik-af-togregning/] but not sure if they're related (My laptop translates "Dansk Jenbane" as "Danish Railways" so all could be unrelated!). –Davey2010^Talk 14:47, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

::Indeed it seems this translates to Danish Railway as other articles have the word "jernbane" as well. SwisterTwister talk 20:48, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

:::So we're a bit fucked source wise {{p|grin}}, Would be nice if a Danish person showed up lol. –Davey2010^Talk 20:50, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

• Move to CFL Cargo Denmark - Not gonna lie the whole naming thing is a tad confusing but there we go, Seems better to Move instead of merging to I guess an irrelevant article, Can't be bothered to fiddle with all the above so take this as my final answer lol. –Davey2010^Talk 02:02, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:02, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:02, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:02, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

• Comment: If kept it should be moved to CFL Cargo Denmark, as the company got a new name in 2006/07. Same owner then and now (directly or indirecly, not totally clear to me presently): CFL, hence the name which in Danish is CFL Cargo Danmark ApS (ApS=Ltd/LLC). If you want to search for sources on the pre-2007 name include ApS and in quotes: [//www.google.com/search?q={{urlencode:"Dansk Jernbane ApS"}}{{#if:|&tbs=li:1|}} "Dansk Jernbane ApS"]. Otherwise you could very well end up with a great deal of confusion with Danske Statsbaner. I'm not overly impressed with the hits we get. Leaving out the ApS [//www.google.com/search?q={{urlencode:"Dansk Jernbane"}}{{#if:|&tbs=li:1|}} "Dansk Jernbane"] is challenging as you will get hits on dansk jernbane which is simply "Danish railway" and not a proper noun. I'll try to look into it later. Did this help? -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 23:59, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

• Weak keep based on the added sources, and move as suggested above. -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 05:18, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
• Weak keep in accordance with Sam Sailor.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 17:06, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.