Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dantwann crane
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Pastor Theo (talk) 00:04, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
===Dantwann crane===
:{{la|Dantwann crane}} ([{{fullurl:Dantwann crane|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dantwann crane}}&action=delete}} delete]) –
Notability is asserted so A7 does not apply, but I haven't been able to find sources to verify the claims in the article. A [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&q=%22Dantwann+crane%22&cf=all Google News Archive search] returns no reliable sources. The only proof of this individual's accomplishments can be found on [http://www.whoisdancrane.webs.com/ his website]. Cunard (talk) 23:24, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete No independant sources. Wikipedia is not the place to post your resume. Edward321 (talk) 00:09, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete I see no reason not to speedy. Beach drifter (talk) 00:53, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Dan who? Obvious WP:Autobiography full of WP:LARD. -- Ϫ 01:56, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Blatant WP:Autobiography of course — that annoying twilight zone between no assertion and blatant spam, yet still a heaping helping of WP:LARD, which has just become my new favorite Wikipedia editor jargon — especially now that some people think it's impolite to use WP:VANITY. --Closeapple (talk) 01:13, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - Although I'm sure they are quite an achievement, none of the listed accomplishments are notable as evidenced by a complete lack of coverage about those accomplishments. -- Whpq (talk) 15:30, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.