Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark tree

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:28, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

=[[Dark tree]]=

:{{la|Dark tree}} ([{{fullurl:Dark tree|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark tree}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Reason: non notable creature with no outside sources. shadzar|Talk|contribs 23:13, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

:Delete This article is absolute crap. It has zero sources, zero assertions of notability, and zero layman info. Send it to the cemetery. -Jéské ^{(v^_^v +2 Pen of Editing)} 00:59, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Delete Article fails Save vs. Death roll, completely made up Doc Strange^{Telepathic Messages}Strange Frequencies 02:43, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

:*I see we have a 2E guy here. I'm more used to seeing "fails Fortitude save." -Jéské ^{(v^_^v +2 Pen of Editing)} 03:21, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

:**Yeah, i grew up on the old 2E, and play 3E now, but it's a relevant reference, nonetheless Doc Strange^{Telepathic Messages}Strange Frequencies 04:37, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Delete Per WP:NFT. This article is completely un-notable. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 03:00, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Not every D&D creature is notable. Very few are, actually. This is no slaad or death knight, so away it goes. (I'm going to copy-paste this into all of the D&D creature AfD's going on right now. Couldn't we have combined them for ease?) --Ig8887 (talk) 03:23, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
No, because a mass-nomination comes across as someone on a mission and a rapier. -Jéské ^{(v^_^v +2 Pen of Editing)} 03:28, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletions. --Gavin Collins (talk) 10:05, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete No secondary sources, no assertion of notability. Fails WP:RPG/N and WP:N. Percy Snoodle (talk) 10:37, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete — non-notable. Mention in a list. Cheers, Jack Merridew 11:21, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Comment surprisingly its not made-up as it [http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/ag/20030805a appears on the Wizards page] for Monsters of Faerûn. But its still fails WP:N with flying colors Doc Strange^{Telepathic Messages}Strange Frequencies 14:45, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete, yet another super minor D&D creature that has an article for some reason. J Milburn (talk) 20:48, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. —Pixelface (talk) 23:40, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.