Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DataShackle Framework

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:14, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

=[[DataShackle Framework]]=

:{{la|DataShackle Framework}} ([{{fullurl:DataShackle Framework|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DataShackle Framework}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Recreation of a recently deleted article (Expired prod - WP:NN software created by article's author.) Please note that this article was created by a different user, a likely sockpuppet of the software's author. Toddst1 (talk) 13:48, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Delete and salt. Non-notable, non-consumer software, obvious advertising, and unintelligible to the point of patent nonsense. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:03, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Delete- although salting is a bit exteme, since, as I understand it, reposting information deleted by Prod is considered a contesting of the prod, not a reposting of information deleted by discussion (which also means its not G4 eligible). However without any sourcing to back up any claims of notability, there's no reason to actually keep the article. Umbralcorax (talk) 14:45, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:58, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.