Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Date Mart

:{{la|Date Mart}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Date Mart}})

The original version of this article, which was proposed for deletion, included an accreditation of this term to a computer scientist whose name bears a strong resemblance to the username of the author of the article, implying original research. That accreditation has been removed along with the proposed deletion template. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:11, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

The accreditation has been removed per my understanding of the policy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Datasanj (talk • contribs) 14:33, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Delete is my vote. There is no verifiable source. The text is unclearly written. Notability is not well established. — fcsuper ^{(How's That?, That's How!)} _{([http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Exclusionism Exclusionistic] [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Immediatism Immediatist] )} — 05:07, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

• Delete - I cannot find substantial coverage of this to indicate that this a well-defined and noted type of database. I though this [http://www.anzustech.com/data/jstander/opnwld97.pdf paper] might have something, but it turns out to have been a typo, and was really referring to "data mart". -- Whpq (talk) 18:34, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:54, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.