Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daughter of the Nile

:{{la|Daughter of the Nile}} ([{{fullurl:Daughter of the Nile|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daughter of the Nile}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Fails to meet WP:NOTFILM Gigs (talk) 00:55, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

• Redirect Weak keep per below, or redirect and merge to Crest of the Royal Family; exists [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0093633/] but appears to fail and appears to satisfy WP:NF. JJL (talk) 01:01, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 01:16, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
• Keep as 'the film has received a major award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking'. Article has now been amended to reflect this. --Wavehunter (talk) 01:25, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
• I'm not sure how major the Torino Film Festival is, it doesn't even have an article (Though maybe it should?). Thanks for improving the article though. Gigs (talk) 02:58, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
• Agreed. I knew nothing of the Turin festival until I found its website yesterday. The TFF is now in its 27th year and the site gives some information on Daughter of the Nile [http://www.torinofilmfest.org/index.php?action=detail&id=3670 here]. The TFF is included in the [http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torino_Film_Festival Italian], [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torino_Film_Festival German] and [http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Festival_du_film_de_Turin French] versions of Wikipedia. One for the translators, perhaps?! Wavehunter (talk) 15:58, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
• Keep. The Torino Film Festival certainly seems to be important enough for winners there to be considered notable, with [http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?um=1&ned=uk&hl=en&num=100&q=%22Torino+Film+Festival%22&cf=all 1750 Google News hits] and [http://books.google.co.uk/books?um=1&ned=uk&hl=en&num=100&q=%22Torino%20Film%20Festival%22&cf=all&sa=N&tab=np 320 from Google Books], the fifth of which says that it's "dubbed second only to Venice on the crowded ltalian festival circuit". Phil Bridger (talk) 18:11, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep as the film is "historically notable" per (pick any one) "the film was given a commercial re-release, or screened in a festival, at least five years after initial release" [http://newyorkfilmfestival.net/archive/wrt/programs/10-99/hou/hou.htm New York Film Festival, 1999], the film has been "The film was featured as part of a documentary, program, or retrospective on the history of (Taiwanese) cinema"[http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/59713307.xml?dids=59713307:59713307&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Sep+08%2C+2000&author=Michael+O'Sullivan%3B+Desson+Howe&pub=The+Washington+Post&desc=FILM+NOTES%3B+More+Films+at+Visions%3B+Taiwanese+Retrospective&pqatl=google Washington Post, 2000], and "was selected for preservation in a (Taiwanese) national archive" [http://ipac.hkfa.lcsd.gov.hk/ipac20/ipac.jsp?session=123573W8925MM.9850&profile=hkfa&uri=full=3100024@!33690@!0&ri=1&aspect=advanced&menu=search&source=192.168.110.61@!horizon&ipp=20&staffonly=&&aspect=advanced&menu=search&ri=1#focus Hong Kong Film Archive]. I was doing some AfD forced WP:Cleanup when my computer locked up. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 00:56, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.