Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Davao Catholic Herald

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:26, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

=[[Davao Catholic Herald]]=

:{{la|Davao Catholic Herald}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Davao_Catholic_Herald Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Davao Catholic Herald}})

The subject lacks significant coverage; reliable sources can't be found. Tagged for PROD but it was contested by a newly-registered user whose edits involve removal of PRODs. Sixth o f March 00:35, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:23, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:23, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:42, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Delete as questionably better for a better notable and improvable article, delete for now until better is available. SwisterTwister talk 05:29, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:01, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SSTflyer 00:59, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Delete. No sources offered and none to be found. Bishonen | talk 21:31, 6 April 2016 (UTC).

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.