Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Ronan

:{{la|Dave Ronan}} ([{{fullurl:Dave Ronan|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Ronan}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

:({{findsources|Dave Ronan}})

Was going to go with CSD but wanted a second opinion so I decided to bring it up to AfD. Calaka (talk) 11:10, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

• Delete as a complete non-entity. CSD would have been declined due to the slimmest of assertions of notability so AfD is the correct place to bring it; however, the kid is just another college student, no different from a million others. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 12:45, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 12:01, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity article, completely not notable. WWGB (talk) 12:05, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
• Delete Pointless. - Shiftchange (talk) 14:47, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
• Delete Insufficient notability. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:52, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
• Delete - I would have speedied this. Non-notable. --Roisterer (talk) 00:15, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
• Delete - non-notable unless you count an Old Boys footy match.[https://www.clubsonline.com.au/news/index.cfm?fuseaction=display_main&NewsID=5235&OrgID=2055&cfid=9302331&cftoken=73112579&dts=11020080421]  florrie  04:35, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.