Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Koyzis (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:06, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

=[[David Koyzis]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Koyzis}}

:{{la|David Koyzis}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/David_Koyzis_(2nd_nomination) Stats])

:({{Find sources|David Koyzis}})

Non-notable author fails WP:GNG (multiple independent reliable sources giving substantial coverage), as well as alternative criteria at WP:AUTHOR and WP:ANYBIO. This article was previously deleted here according to consensus; nothing has made this subject any more notable. JFHJr (㊟) 05:20, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Delete Earlier AfD continues to apply. See [http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Bible_(King_James)/Ecclesiastes#Chapter_1 Ecclesiastes 1:2]. This is just one in an apparent walled garden of articles, all by the same editor, about non-notable faculty at a ~~50(!)-student~~ 50-staffmember, 250-student "University" -- see the linked names at List_of_Redeemer_University_College_faculty. Anyone feel like taking this on? EEng (talk) 01:18, 9 July 2012 (UTC) P.S. Don't forget to turn him into a pillar of WP:SALT. Upon some of Cato's friends expressing their surprise, that while many persons without merit or reputation had statues, he had none, he answered, "I had much rather it should be asked why the people have not erected a statue to Cato, than why they have."
Delete -- does not pass GNG, Author, or PROF. But a recreation after 7 years isn't enough grounds for a SALT; our policies have changed since 2005, just not enough to make this bio notable. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 03:31, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Delete for lack of evidence of passing WP:PROF or WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 09:53, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.