Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David R. Darrow

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 13:57, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

=[[David R. Darrow]]=

:{{la|David R. Darrow}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/David_R._Darrow Stats])

:({{Find sources|David R. Darrow}})

Autobiography with insufficient evidence of notability. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:15, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

  • Comment An impressively created article, but possibly not sufficient notability. The core of notability here is the coverage that proves it, and I'm afraid the references here aren't worth tuppence. Referring to an edit summary by the author (who appears to be the subject), no, we're not saying it's not true. There is a lot that is true but which doesn't get into an encyclopaedia. Merely existing isn't excuse for an article. If better referencing appears (but I feel from the said summary that the author was having difficulties), then there is more chance of survival. If not, there is always the chance of return when the references are found. Good luck. Peridon (talk) 09:48, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete no matter how well-written an article is, if there are no reliable independent sources, we have no idea if it's accepted as a notable phenomenon or if it's just someone's promotional piece to get more google hits. Does not meet the WP:GNG. Vcessayist (talk) 00:31, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
  • comment there is this [http://books.google.com/books?id=0P8DAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA42&lpg=PA42&dq=%22David+R.+Darrow%22&source=bl&ots=ghULTpaFav&sig=eyxOmmABdHGooVlmCHoxXYoTAqw&hl=en&sa=X&ei=F1x0UN_zCaHWygGRk4G4DA&ved=0CD8Q6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=%22David%20R.%20Darrow%22&f=false "Darrow represents the burgeoning trend of artist-turned-blogger"], but that is a single source. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:24, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:45, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:45, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 19:10, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete No wp:notability-suitable references, no real references, no indicaiton of wp:notability. North8000 (talk) 19:24, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. No notability nor reliable sources. -- Wikipedical (talk) 20:04, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete No independent and reliable references to be found. References for the book covers do not mention Darrow. Article is written by Mr. Darrow. Bgwhite (talk) 21:38, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.