Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Riehm

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=David Riehm}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=David Riehm}})

Fails to meet WP:GNG (specifically WP:SIGCOV), WP:NBASIC, or WP:FILMMAKER. There is no mention of any films actually made, and the only news coverage of the subject falls under WP:BLPCRIME.

Looking at the citations and external links, there is:

• One dead link to a blog post
• The first page of a CourtTV article, comprised of a WP:PRIMARY copy of his essay and four sentence summary of the events.
• Pioneer Press article: a local newspaper with mentions of the subject where he is not the focus. It cites the CourtTV article for information about Riehm.
• Star Tribune article: a local newspaper article largely covering the notable event. I would say this is the closes to WP:SIGCOV and furthest from WP:PRIMARY
• Two additional dead links to news stories

Vegantics (talk) 16:40, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

• Delete, in part because the early versions of this article appear to reproduce the lurid story at issue. Kablammo (talk) 13:25, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:56, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime and Minnesota. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:16, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
• Delete - I’m in agreement with the nom. I add that besides the poor sourcing, it appears to be a local news story, and whatever bad thing this person did when young does not balance out a WP:BLP violation. Bearian (talk) 02:02, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.