Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Davin Griffiths-Jones (2nd nomination)

:{{la|Davin Griffiths-Jones}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Davin_Griffiths-Jones_(2nd_nomination) Stats])

:({{Find sources|Davin Griffiths-Jones}})

Fails WP:GNG - hasn't been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources. Also fails WP:CREATIVE and WP:ENTERTAINER Hack (talk) 12:52, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

• Weak Keep The Mo Awards would appear to meet WP:ANYBIO. Doctorhawkes (talk) 09:03, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

:*Comment - not really sure you could describe the latter-day Mo Awards as a well-known or significant award. Most major newspapers don't even cover the awards ceremony (if held at all). Hack (talk) 11:15, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

• Delete. Not notable. — Wyliepedia 10:06, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 18:37, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

• 'Delete. I agree, I have no idea what I saw for the references and they do not meet Wikipedia's notibility guidelines nor is this article notable. WisconsinBoyClevelandRocks228844 (talk) 03:10, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
• 'Delete fails WP:BIO and WP:ENT. LibStar (talk) 07:27, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.