Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dawn Padmore

=[[Dawn Padmore]]=

:{{la|Dawn Padmore}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dawn Padmore}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Dawn Padmore}})

This singer is called Liberian, but she appears to live in NYC now. Her [http://www.dawnpadmore.com/Dawn_Padmore_press.htm press page] doesn't list much substantial, and I can't find anything much in google or google news. For a notable performer in the US there should be more coverage than this. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:52, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

  • Comment I found an [http://archives-two.liberiaseabreeze.com/dawn-padmore.html interview] in the Sea Breeze Journal of Contemporary Liberian Writings and a [http://canadasachamber.com/news/Index.cfm?fuseaction=NewsDetail&NewsID=16 review] at [http://canadasachamber.com/ this website]. There are some reviews of her performances in the [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Dawn+Padmore%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&btnG=Search+Archives Google Search Archives], and she was [http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/23/arts/music/23port.html?_r=1&pagewanted=print mentioned] also in The NY Times. I'm not sure with the reliability of [http://www.welcomeliberia.com/spotlight/ this profile] at the website Welcome Liberia.--Vejvančický (talk) 08:02, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Weak keep I think there are some sources which exist which indicate she is of some notability. But Jen has a point that the coverage isn't that spectacular. She has though sung for people such as Desmond Tutu which I would hardly call a bar singer... ‡ Himalayan ‡ ΨMonastery 10:45, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep. Clearly notable with at least one NY Times review (now added to the article) and apparently other newspaper reviews in N America. --Kleinzach 13:29, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Polarpanda (talk) 13:30, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep "there should be more" is hardly an argument for deletion. Consider reading some arguments to avoid in deletion discussions?--TM 13:39, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Strong KEEP: Some more info and fleshing out of some refs. Could always use more research (still a stub) but NYT piece is convincing, even if not wildly enthusiastic.....Viva-Verdi (talk) 21:04, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep. Meets the notability criteria of WP:MUSICBIO. Wikipeterproject (talk) 22:43, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.