Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dead monkey

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, as unverified and failing notability guidelines. Davewild (talk) 19:05, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

=[[Dead monkey]]=

:{{la|Dead monkey}} ([{{fullurl:Dead monkey|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dead monkey}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Non-notable neologism. Ged UK (talk) 18:39, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Delete. No evidence of notability, simply a dictionary definition. Bart133 ^{t c @ How's my driving?} 19:02, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete Does not establish notability, unencyclopedic, has only one (difficult to comprehend) source. CCG _(T-C) 19:09, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Something not verifiable. Reference is to Japanese novel (misspelt author Kenzaburō Ōe). Dzied Bulbash (talk) 19:11, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete per nom -- Darth Mike _(Talk _{• Contribs)} 20:57, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete per unnotable and unverifiable neologism. Artene50 (talk) 04:04, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete this unverified neologism. Cliff smith ^talk 19:39, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete - although it may have been used in a novel, this in my opinion is pretty much a WP:SNOW candidate.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 20:23, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.