Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deahsha McQueen

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 06:32, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

=[[Deahsha McQueen]]=

:{{la|Deahsha McQueen}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Deahsha McQueen}})

Currently up for sticky prod as unreferenced. However, sticky prod doesn't affect existing deletion processes, and a search for sources doesn't reveal anything that indicates this singer passes WP:MUSIC. A grand total of three Yahoo/Bing hits, and a Google search reveals the usual mix of Myspace, Facebook and promotional pages. Blueboy 96 19:11, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 22:40, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

::and what are the Yahoo/Bing hits? are they sufficient to justify removing the BLPPROD? If not, there would normally be no reason to bring it here; the point of having BLPPROD is to avoid the overhead of an AfD so we can concentrate on the articles which need fuller consideration. DGG ( talk ) 05:27, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

:::When there's no prospect of there being any sources that would allow an article to pass muster, it doesn't seem to make a whole lot of sense to let it stay for 10 days. I admit, it's ignoring a rule, but as I see it, this article was headed for AFD in any event--best to put it out of its misery. Blueboy 96 17:49, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

::::Why do you believe it was headed for AFD anyways? -- Whpq (talk) 17:55, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

:::::When I tried to find sources for this article, all I got was Myspace, Facebook and promotional pages--in other words, this article fails WP:MUSIC by a city mile. Blueboy 96 19:26, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

::::::Right, but a sticky PROD will have deleted this without the overhead of an AFD. Why bother bringin it to AFD? -- Whpq (talk) 19:54, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

:::::::No sense in letting it stay for an extra five days if it's clear that she isn't notable enough for an article. Blueboy 96 20:37, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

::::::::AFDs are open for 7 days, so the difference is a rather minor 3 days. It's a lot of busy work for no gain. -- Whpq (talk) 21:50, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Delete. Non-notable artist. Maybe one day she'll strike it big, but right now she just isn't notable. I didn't find anything that could even remotely cause her to pass WP:MUSIC Tokyogirl79 (talk) 23:58, 2 October 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79

Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:33, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.