Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death, Dungeons and Taxes Party

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz talk 04:24, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

=[[Death, Dungeons and Taxes Party]]=

AfDs for this article:
    {{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death, Dungeons and Taxes Party}}

:{{la|Death, Dungeons and Taxes Party}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Death,_Dungeons_and_Taxes_Party Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Death,Dungeons and Taxes Party}})

Not notable party, against GNG and other policies. Not a political party with any achievements of note, and with no lasting cultural significance. doktorb wordsdeeds 09:09, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. doktorb wordsdeeds 09:13, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:56, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:56, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Keep as a political party which fielded candidates for office per WP:IAR — Use Common Sense to Improve the Encyclopedia. Carrite (talk) 14:33, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Weak keep Media coverage is admittedly sparse, but the party is (or least was) a verifiably existing one, and has actually fielded candidates in a significant election and thus is marginally notable.--Ddcm8991 (talk) 18:14, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 09:24, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Keep Satirical political parties can still be notable. The article is admittedly small, but can be improved with a little research.--TMD Talk Page. 15:47, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.