Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deathlog

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. None, despite three relists, have challenged the nomination. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 14:01, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

=[[Deathlog]]=

:{{la|Deathlog}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Deathlog Stats])

:({{Find sources|Deathlog}})

I don't think this passes WP:N and in fact it is likely this falls into a full out WP:OR. The few sources uses don't seem to use this term, which I couldn't really see used much anywhere else (Google, GBooks, GSchilar; what's there are mostly false positive for some logarithms about death statistics). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:32, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete. Agree with the nomination that this is below the notability threshold. The sources do not properly support the content. What sources there are for the term are related to different usages (e.g., various computer games). QuiteUnusual (talk) 13:26, 12 August 2014 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MrScorch6200 (talk | ctrb) 04:15, 19 August 2014 (UTC)



:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:22, 26 August 2014 (UTC)



:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (warn) @ 20:50, 2 September 2014 (UTC)


:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.