Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deciso

:{{la|Deciso}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Deciso Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Deciso}})

Self-promoting page for non-notable company. Majority of references are primary, unreliable, or one-sentence mentions and are breaking all possible rules and guidelines including WP:GNG. Mnlth (talk) 20:13, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

• Delete - As stated above, notability is not established. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 23:13, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
• Delete - Almost entirely primary sources, plus the contents of the sources is "business as usual". Non-notable company. LaMona (talk) 02:05, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

• Delete for now as my searches found nothing better than press releases and the amount of that concerns me so there's nothing to suggest better signs of notability and improvement. SwisterTwister talk 06:36, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
• Delete Seems to clearly fail WP:CORP and WP:GNG. No significant coverage, refs are not WP:RS. --Jersey92 (talk) 14:07, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.