Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delta Delta Phi Zeta

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 01:05, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

=[[Delta Delta Phi Zeta]]=

:{{la|Delta Delta Phi Zeta}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Delta_Delta_Phi_Zeta Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Delta Delta Phi Zeta}})

Does not appear to meet Wikipedia:WikiProject Fraternities and Sororities/Notability, created by COI editor and only sources are related to the organisation itself Melcous (talk) 01:34, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

:I'd rather this page not get deleted. Xmskab (talk) 01:44, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

  • Strong delete. Single-chapter organization, no evidence of significance or coverage beyond their campus. —C.Fred (talk) 01:50, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Blatantly non-notable; seems to only have the one chapter and no secondary coverage at all. -IagoQnsi (talk) 05:01, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete Lacks evidence to prove notability according to the guidelines, and it is unlikely that such information will be available any time soon. Perhaps in the future, if the organization expands or becomes more notable, could it have its own encyclopedic entry.--MarshalN20 Talk 17:59, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:46, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:46, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:46, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

  • Delete Fails WP:GNG. A recently-formed, small, single-chapter sorority. No significant, independent coverage found. I don't even see a claim of notability in the article. It was founded 4 years ago, it still exists, and it has 4 letters in its name... not much there. Note that Wikipedia:WikiProject Fraternities and Sororities/Notability is not useful in deciding the notability of this article, since it's a dormant essay that was created in a few hours by only one user. Meters (talk) 20:40, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.