Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delta Phi Mu

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:31, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

=[[Delta Phi Mu]]=

:{{la|Delta Phi Mu}} ([{{fullurl:Delta Phi Mu|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delta Phi Mu}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Blatant advertising, appears to be non-notable sorority, advertising/promotional tone of article, no independent sources for notability found. Cquan (after the beep...) 04:19, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete--no notability, and not a single meaningful hit. Google News has a couple of hits, but none of the ones I looked at are really independent and in-depth. Drmies (talk) 05:39, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep--I see no sense in deleting an article that is causing no harm. I don't quite understand the "lack of notability" argument for deleting articles either. FYI, I edited a link on this article a while ago, but that was just to help the page look better. The biggest "problem" with these small organizational articles is that many of these organizations do not have that great of a history or that much to write about. They have the right to at least have a blurb about them in Wikipedia.DPRVig (talk) 06:24, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

:*Comment - WP:NOHARM is not a valid arguement for keeping an article. Pyrrhus16 (talk) 11:19, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.