Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demitarianism

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Semi-vegetarianism. It looks like semi-vegetarianism is a better home than flexitarianism. Feel free to make the merge in the other direction if you disagree. Malinaccier (talk) 00:29, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

=[[:Demitarianism]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Demitarianism}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Demitarianism}})

It took a somewhat deeper analysis than usual, however I'm convinced that the topic does not cross the threshold of notability. The term's use is limited to a "declaration" produced at some 2009 workshop in France and a report produced in 2013 by one of its participants (and author of the term). Barring a single article in the Guardian, neither the report nor the idea has been picked up by the mainstream science or media.

Monthly Google Trends reports shows single-digit searches for Demitarian, typically 0–7 searches per month worldwide[https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&q=Demitarian].

The ar-wiki version is a word-for-word translation of the first two paragraphs of the en-wiki article. The es-wiki article is practically unsourced (none of the five references mentions demitarianism).

All in all, the article appears created as some sort of promotion/advocacy while the topic appears to fall short of WP:GNG. — kashmīrī TALK 20:46, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. — kashmīrī TALK 20:46, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Keep and rename Demitarian diet, passes WP:GNG based on significant coverge in independent reliable sources.{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/feb/18/halve-meat-consumption-scientists |publisher=The Guardian |title=Halve meat consumption, scientists urge rich world |author=Fiona Harvey |date=18 February 2013 |access-date=24 May 2022}}{{cite journal |url=https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Agroecosystem_Diversity/kihyDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PA391&printsec=frontcover |pages=391-413 |first1=Gilles |last1=Billen |first2=Luis |last2=Lassaletta |first3=Josette |last3=Garnier |first4=Julia |last4=Le Noë |first5=Eduardo |last5=Aguilera |first6=Alberto |last6=Sanz-Cobeña |title=Chapter 25 - Opening to Distant Markets or Local Reconnection of Agro-Food Systems? Environmental Consequences at Regional and Global Scales |journal=Agroecosystem Diversity |year=2018 |publisher=Elsevier Science |isbn=9780128110515 |doi=10.1016/B978-0-12-811050-8.00025-X}} SailingInABathTub (talk) 21:11, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

{{reflist-talk}}

:{{Comment}} Sorry but I'm not seeing any "significant coverage". The Guardian piece is already linked in the article as is pretty much the only mention in the popular media that I was able to find in English. The second source, i.e., the chapter of a niche book, indeed discusses the idea of the demitarian diet, however it's not an {{tpq|independent source}}, because the chapter's lead author Gilles Billen sits on the management committee of NinE[http://www.nine-esf.org/node/22/index.html], the organisation behind the Barsac Declaration, and also is a signatory of the Declaration. So, it still looks like a far cry from WP:GNG. — kashmīrī TALK 22:28, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

:: Good point. I found other examples of significant coverage in academic literature, but as you point out, at least one of the authors in each case (Erisman, Sutton, & Billen) are involved with NinE, and so not independent. The Guardian article appears to be the only independent reliable coverage. SailingInABathTub (talk) 23:26, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:24, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 12:07, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

  • Comment - There's an overlap with other Wikipedia articles that address meat reduction. In particular, there's a merge being proposed between Flexitarianism and Semi-vegetarianism. Assuming that we decide that an article specifically on Demitarianism is not justified, it seems to me that a merge/redirect to one of these articles would be in order. — Charles Stewart (talk) 12:22, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Merge, with Flexitarianism#Definitions, per User:Chalst. This article could be fairly easily reduced to a few sentences based on the only reliable secondary source, and then merged into the broader topic. SailingInABathTub (talk) 13:31, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Merge with Flexitarianism#Definitions, following {{u|SailingInABathTub}}'s support of my suggestion. — Charles Stewart (talk) 02:36, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Reducing meat consumption for environmental reasons is a topic we should, and probably do already, cover, but not under this name. Phil Bridger (talk) 08:34, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Merge with Flexitarianism#Definitions per above.4meter4 (talk) 19:41, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.