Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demo 98/99

=[[Demo 98/99]]=

AfDs for this article:
    {{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demo 98/99}}

:{{la|Demo 98/99}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demo 98/99}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Demo 98/99}})

Non-notable demo album. WP:MUSIC. While there are sources, most of them just reference the demo in passing and some do not appear credible. —Justin (koavf)TCM☯ 06:29, 14 March 2010 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 00:02, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

  • Comment. Oh, shoot; I forgot about this. I was going to post commentary at first, but then I went to other things and forgot about this. Sorry about you having to prolong the discussion. Now, to the point. I do acknowledge that theere are some demo articles which can break rules of wikipedia article acceptance. This one might. It didn't result in them being signed; matter of fact, Vaakevandring split up before releasing anything else until reuiniting again and splitting up once more after an EP which is almost a re-release of the demo. The EP of 2004 and the demo of 1999 have three tracks in common, and the demo is entirely consisted of three tracks. So therefore, is this article really necessary. I thought about this and have decided to say no, it is not necessarily. You can delete if you wish to. This officially counts as a delete vote. It was fun having the article up when it lasted, though. Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 03:55, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete per author request, above. Other editors on the page, though, so a G7 doesn't work. The title should likely redirect to Vaakevandring, in the absence of any other likely target. No objection to a mention or discussion of this demo on the band's page - and one or more of the sources here may be of value there. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 14:18, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.