Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denis Muller

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:17, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Denis Muller]]=

:{{la|Denis Muller}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Denis_Muller Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Denis Muller}})

fails WP:PROF. all the sources provided are primary and no articles link to this. LibStar (talk) 07:11, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 08:51, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 08:51, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Delete As per nom. Fails SIGCOV. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 09:20, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 02:22, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Delete. not yet notable. DGG ( talk ) 23:00, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Delete - searches turned up nothing to show he passes WP:GNG and he certainly does not pass WP:NACADEMIC. There is another academic with this same name, but it appears he is in a different field, and based in the U.S. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:14, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.