Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denise Siegel
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:30, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
=[[:Denise Siegel]]=
:{{la|1=Denise Siegel}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Denise Siegel}})
There are a number of assertions of notability, but they're minor and nearly unverifiable. She does not appear to meet notability criteria as an author or an artist. Possibly as a commercial photographer, but it doesn't appear so. Thoughts? Star Mississippi 21:26, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Authors, Women, and California. Star Mississippi 21:26, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. None of this adds up to actual notability. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:37, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - I checked the article sources which are mostly name checks that do not contribute to notability. I then searched for her band Eenie Meenie to see if that revealed biographic info on her, but was not successful. She has photographed numerous notable people as a commercial photographer, but I could not find SIGCOV of her as a photographer nor notable collections or exhibitions, and notability is not inherited from those she photographed. This person does not meet our criteria for WP:GNG, WP:NARTIST nor WP:MUSICIAN. The BEFORE search I conducted doesn't result in anything that could be added to the article to improve it, or solidify notability. Netherzone (talk) 21:51, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. I was starting to suspect this article conflated multiple people with the same name (or maybe even made the person up entirely), but the subject apparently has [http://denisesiegelpsychic.weebly.com/ a website] that can at least vouch for some of the claims. The subject has had a diverse and interesting career, but I can't find enough significant reliable independent coverage to build an encyclopedia article. --Animalparty! (talk) 04:02, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. Doesn't satisfy WP:GNG MaskedSinger (talk) 11:36, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.