Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denver Bladium

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Denver Bladium}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Denver_Bladium Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Denver Bladium}})

Unsourced (WP:GNG) and promotional (WP:PROMO) for over a decade. SportingFlyer T·C 20:13, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer T·C 20:13, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:55, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

• Delete an unsourced article. It is high time we stopped allowing any of these.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:44, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
• Comment – Hi {{u|SportingFlyer}}: part of your nomination is not valid. See WP:NEXIST, part of Wikipedia's Notability guideline page, where it states, "notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article". In other words, an article that lacks sources can still potentially meet GNG requirements is such sources simply exist. They do not have to be present in the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:20, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

:*I did a before search as always, I'm just highlighting the absolute lack of sources in this article. Could also have gone with a fails WP:NCORP. SportingFlyer T·C 18:27, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.