Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deprivation index
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Multiple deprivation index. Sandstein 07:01, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
=[[:Deprivation index]]=
:{{la|Deprivation index}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Deprivation index}})
just an unreferenced list Rathfelder (talk) 23:40, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:43, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:43, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:43, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. Appears to be a perfectly reasonable list/disambiguation article. --Michig (talk) 07:20, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
- Merge with Multiple deprivation index. (I don't have strong feelings for which name to keep.) This is a legitimate area of study, see e.g. [http://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/50587193.pdf OECD], Journal of [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953618305094 Social Science and Medicine], [https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/abs/10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0709?journalCode=hlthaff Journal of Health Affairs], [https://jech.bmj.com/content/jech/58/3/250.full.pdf Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health], [https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/46236423/Measuring_multiple_deprivation_at_the_sm20160604-29942-b6nvs4.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1553958830&Signature=Gw9uRf7firb2O0Hl0NvuXgm0upI%3D&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DMeasuring_multiple_deprivation_at_the_sm.pdf Journal of Environment and Planning] ([http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.452.4424&rep=rep1&type=pdf again]), etc. While the most prominent use is in the UK, many of these articles indicate more limited usage elsewhere, and the current MDI article's lede is probably incorrect - these two articles describe the same fundamental topic. MarginalCost (talk) 14:18, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 14:20, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:57, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
- Merger seems sensible.Rathfelder (talk) 12:14, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.