Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derek Bryce-Smith
=[[Derek Bryce-Smith]]=
:{{la|Derek Bryce-Smith}} – (
:({{Find sources|Derek Bryce-Smith}})
Does not meet Wikipedia guidelines for notability of biographies. Nevard (talk) 23:52, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 07:33, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. He passes WP:PROF#C7 ("substantial impact outside academia") and there's enough news coverage of him for WP:GNG as well. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:46, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. The Guardian obituary already referenced in the article plus the first few hits from a Google News archive search (particularly [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/8671336/Pollution-triumph-of-the-inconvenient-truth.html the first]) comprise significant coverage in independent reliable sources to meet WP:BASIC Qwfp (talk) 08:03, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. Notable and noted environmental campaigner. Xxanthippe (talk) 08:26, 9 October 2011 (UTC).
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:54, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.