Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derrick Broussard

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Derrick Broussard}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Derrick Broussard}})

Player does not qualify for WP:NRU (Major League Rugby is not a notable league under WP:NRU and Philippines aren't a high performance union), only brief mentions and news of him signing for sides so does not qualify for WP:GNG either. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 16:21, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:14, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:14, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:14, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:15, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

• Keep Seems to me to meet WP:GNG, as at least one source is “substantial coverage”, viz. an article about Broussard and not a brief mention. Moonraker (talk) 07:25, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

:: Don't believe any of the sources on the page or that I can find are 'substantial coverage', that are independent of the source/tournament. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 10:53, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

::{{U|Moonraker}}, as has been discussed here can you show which of the sources in the article provide enough significant coverage for it to pass WP:GNG or if there are other sources that you believe enough to allow it to pass WP:GNG can you provide them. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 15:39, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

• Delete Let's go through the sources: the sdlegion one is a dead link, american rugby news is a data sheet, so all that's left is two articles from djcoilrugby.com, which are mostly duplicates of each other, so really only one source. Now, this source is relatively long, but it is mostly a string of biographical facts, with little analysis. Furthermore, I think the reliability of this source could be called into question - I don't see much to suggest they do fact-checking or corrections, and the author isn't that clearly indicated. I conclude that the current sourcing is not enough for notability. PJvanMill)talk( 17:28, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
• Delete per PJ above me Spiderone 19:35, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
• Delete: Barely found anything about him. Search results include 2 individuals bearing the same name. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 16:00, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.