Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desolidify

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 22:53, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

=[[Desolidify]]=

:{{la|Desolidify}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Desolidify Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Desolidify}})

Dictionary definition, no room for this article to expand beyond a dictionary definition. WP:NAD. shoy (reactions) 12:42, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Delete Dic def. On a lighter note: also cringe worthy.--Savonneux (talk) 13:07, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Delete. In addition to being a dictionary definiton and, as noted, cringe-worthy, the content here is factually incorrect; the term was in use well before 2011. The earliest use I could find in a minute or so of searching was a 1940 patent application, although I admittedly wasn't trying very hard. If feeling particularly generous, a redirect to melting is probably excusable on the grounds that redirects are cheap. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 14:23, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:38, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:38, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Delete - agree with nom and above editors. Definitely a dictionary definition. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:40, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.