Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devaki Neogi

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 15:20, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

=[[:Devaki Neogi]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Devaki Neogi}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Devaki_Neogi Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Devaki Neogi}})

Subject is not notable per WP:BASIC, no in depth coverage at non-affiliated sources in article, Google searches didn't return any significant secondary source coverage, no clear claim to notability independent of coverage in sources. Rosguilltalk 07:02, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Delete as per Nomination --Farahpoems (talk) 10:18, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

::please see WP:PERNOM.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 16:14, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:59, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:59, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:59, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Comment My own Google searches returned dozens of mentions in relation to different projects. There is very good coverage of her "Google doodle". Other mentions are in less depth, but she certinaly has aprofessional profile as an illustrator/comics artist I'm not sure how the nominator missed her bing mentioned in [https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/features/international-womens-day-2017-heroes-women-comics-ursula-le-guin-a7615916.html The Independent], the [http://comicsalliance.com/joamette-gil-power-and-magic-interview/ Comics Alliance], in [http://elle.in/culture/fearless-nadia-bollywood-first-feminist-icon/ Elle India] and the [https://www.financialexpress.com/industry/who-was-har-gobind-khorana-google-honours-the-great-biochemist-with-doodle-on-his-96th-birth-anniversary/1007106/ Financial Post]. While the sources could be more in depth, she certainly has a professional presence and has some coverage.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 16:12, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

::I don't know what to say other than that these sources didn't show up in the first few pages of Google search results when I searched "Devaki Neogi"--what did show up was promotional outlets advertising her, but not providing the sort of neutral in-depth coverage we expect. I do want to point out that the elle.in article does not mention Devaki Neogi by name, and that the Financial Express and Independent sources merely namedrop her in connection with one work each. The coverage on Comics Alliance is the most significant of all provided sources, and even that one seems to just be an interview with a colleague of Neogi's that gives her some very warm shoutouts. I don't think there's any question that Neogi is an artist for graphic novels and that she has received some recognition in her career, but these mentions don't appear to quite be enough to meet WP:BASIC, WP:GNGRosguilltalk 17:40, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

:::I agree with you. I just wanted to comment that there is some up and coming notability based on mentions in good sources, but you are right, it is not in depth.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 01:21, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpgjhpjm 15:54, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:12, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.