Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devil (2010 film)

=[[Devil (2010 film)]]=

:{{la|Devil (2010 film)}} ([{{fullurl:Devil (2010 film)|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devil (2010 film)}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Explicitly fails future film notability guidelines. No prejudice towards recreation when reliable sources indicate that filming has already begun. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 04:40, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Cunard (talk) 05:06, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete Waaaaaaay too soon for this article considering it has not even been written yet and the ONLY thing about it on IMDb is a 2011 date. If M. Night is involved, and continues to be involved, there will no doubt be much to qualify this per WP:NFF. But currently? Doesn't even tickle WP:GNG. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 07:39, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. The article only states there's an idea. Without a script, or actual shooting being done, this is way too early to have an article. - Mgm|(talk) 10:24, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete as prodder. At this point, this movie is only a project. -- Blanchardb -MeMyEarsMyMouth- timed 08:24, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:NFF. Stifle (talk) 12:38, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete per the notability guidelines for future films; recreate if it is reliably sourced that production has begun (I imagine that the resulting film would be notable due to Shyamalan's involvement). —Erik (talkcontrib) 00:21, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.