Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dexter B. Wakefield

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kevin (talk) 21:30, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

=[[Dexter B. Wakefield]]=

:{{la|Dexter B. Wakefield}} – (View AfD)(View log)

:({{findsources|Dexter B. Wakefield}})

I'm just not seeing any notability in this deprodded article on an assistant professor. Convince me otherwise. Abductive (reasoning) 18:49, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Delete No apparent notability, agree with nom. —Charles Edward ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 02:49, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 08:14, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Comment. Article contains stubs about two distinct people with this name. I assume we're talking about Dexter Bernard Wakefield? If he winds up being notable, will definitely need to offload these two to their own pages (I'd say keeping this one as a bio-DAB). DMacks (talk) 08:19, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 01:29, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Delete. The academic DBW is an assistant professor, at a stage when most academics do not yet pass WP:PROF, and there's no sign that he's an exception to this. As for the other DBW, he seems to have written a few magazine articles; that's clearly not enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:40, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.