Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diachronic (software)

:{{la|Diachronic (software)}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Diachronic (software)}})

Promotional article for a software of little notability. No references, no significant coverage. Google search on Diachronic "Giovanni De Donà" shows only 11 unique results, mostly domain registrations. A search on Diachronic "Andrea Agostini" shows only this article. Already speedied once, with a second WP:POINTy stub deleted as well. MikeWazowski (talk) 18:04, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

:Note As the admin who deleted the pointy iteration of the article, and who also removed the third DB tag, if the article shows no improvement in the next 24 hours, I have no objection to deleting it again. I decided to give the editor who created the article some room since it appeared that they do not have a strong grasp of written English, but I've yet to see any improvements, and as MikeWazowski points out, the available online references to the article's subject are limited at best. Hiberniantears (talk) 19:15, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete - poor prose that reads like an advertisement, lacks relaible sources, and appears to be non-notable subject at this time. Doc Tropics 18:02, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete as advertisement and no indication of notability, or even a hoax.Jasper Deng (talk) 16:44, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable software. But Jasper, it was trivial to find that it's about www.diachronicmusic.com (advertising not hoax). DMacks (talk) 17:49, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.