Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dian Shi Mali

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:29, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

=[[Dian Shi Mali]]=

:{{la|Dian Shi Mali}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dian_Shi_Mali Stats])

:({{Find sources|Dian Shi Mali}})

Non-notable bootleg; although fascinating, there is not enough sources (PUSH START TO RAZE) ViperSnake151  Talk  18:24, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

::True but that was a bundled AFD where this was nominated with three other articles. Most of (if not all) of the debate centered around the fact that two or the other articles in the bundle were notable, so that close actually does not say much about this article.--70.49.81.26 (talk) 08:13, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

  • Delete or redirect to List of Internet phenomena. I don't see any significant coverage; in fact, I don't really see any coverage. I'll accept that this is/was a meme, however. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:48, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:41, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

  • Comment, I agree with ViperSnake151 that this is a fascinating topic. Removing it from Wikipedia might enhance our credibility as a rigorous work of scholarship but it detracts from our mass appeal. That said, I really can't justify a keep !vote. -Thibbs (talk) 13:40, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete - Not notable. No reliable third party sources. - hahnchen 16:22, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.