Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana May-Waldman
=[[Diana May-Waldman]]=
:{{la|Diana May-Waldman}} – (
:({{findsources|Diana May-Waldman}})
Only books involved in are WP:SELFPUB. Journalism award appears minor. Was deleted once under CSD. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 20:50, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
- Delete I didn't find any reviews of her works published by independent and reliable sources. Nothing indicates particular notability for this person. In my opinion, the subject fails the notability criteria for authors. --Vejvančický (talk) 07:18, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
- keep Ms. May-Waldman's awards were stated to be "minor", which seems insulting, as she won awards two years in a row from the Society of Professional Journalists (added as text to the article). She has also had poetry published in many literary magazines. LitReviewer2 (talk) 00:25, 18 March 2010 (UTC). For independent reviews, check review of book at http://www.storycirclebookreviews.org/reviews/womansong.shtml. , and at Amazon.com: http://www.amazon.com/Womans-Song-Diana-May-Waldman/dp/1615460233/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1269008353&sr=8-2--LitReviewer2
LitReviewer2 (talk) 02:28, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
- Delete I could not find any verification of the awards from the Society of Professional Journalists. The link is merely to the society's website, and a search of that website for her name turns up nothing. The rest of the references are either to non-reliable sources (e.g. the reviews of her book on blogs), or else they simply serve to establish that she does in fact write for a (small local) newspaper. Her main claim to fame seems to be her book of poetry, A Woman's Song, but it was recently deleted as non-notable; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Woman's Song. I suggested at that time that the author herself might turn out to be notable, but she isn't - not according to what is on the record so far. --MelanieN (talk) 21:03, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.