Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital Feudalism

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 20:47, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

=[[:Digital Feudalism]]=

:{{la|Digital Feudalism}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Digital_Feudalism Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Digital Feudalism}})

A concept created by a couple of people with no independent sourcing about it. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and WP:GNG is not met Joseph2302 (talk) 17:47, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Delete From what I can see, it doesn't appear that this meets WP:NEO. Per the guideline: "To support an article about a particular term or concept, we must cite what reliable secondary sources say about the term or concept, not just sources that use the term." Most of the results that I see are links back to the original paper in which the authors coined the term (and the rest don't look like reliable sources), so the notability guideline is not met. PohranicniStraze (talk) 18:09, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:59, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Delete per nom. power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:28, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Delete Insufficient uptake and secondary material to meet GNG. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 09:15, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.