Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital call quality

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 06:48, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

=[[Digital call quality]]=

:{{la|Digital call quality}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Digital_call_quality Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Digital call quality}})

Unsourced POV essay, mishmash of various GSM/audio topics, delete per WP:NOTESSAY, WP:NOR, WP:NEO Vrac (talk) 06:16, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete – Pretty much impossible to source the article title, since telecom carriers have always been interested in call quality, both digital and analog. The author has complaints about GSM voice quality, but those should be added (with sources) to the appropriate articles on GSM or GSM codecs. – Margin1522 (talk) 10:11, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|96%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA1000 10:31, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete This is a very general term, and the article is POV, only focusing on their definition of the term, with no sourcing. 13:39, 6 February 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joseph2302 (talk • contribs)
  • Delete Entirely POV, reads like an essay, totally unsourced. Neiltonks (talk) 14:32, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete as above. -Augustabreeze (talk) 19:42, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.