Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dimitrios Vasiliadis

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 00:12, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

=[[Dimitrios Vasiliadis]]=

:{{la|Dimitrios Vasiliadis}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dimitrios_Vasiliadis Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Dimitrios Vasiliadis}})

This article serves the purpose of self-promotion. Wikipedia is not Linkdin. It might be better suited for Greek Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#G11._Unambiguous_advertising_or_promotion. Politis (talk) 10:58, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Comment - I completed the AfD. ansh666 20:11, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 31 October 2014 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 16:12, 6 November 2014 (UTC)


  • Delete. Looks to me like the subject fails WP:GNG. None of the references in the article pass that guideline, and I was unable through Google to find one that did. --Richard Yin (talk) 18:22, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete I can't find any third-party sources, and not one of the references is about him. His articles do appear in Google Scholar, although it appears to be a small field with limited scholarship, so the highest citation number I found was "2". LaMona (talk) 19:58, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.