Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dimri

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:45, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

=[[Dimri]]=

:{{la|Dimri}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Dimri}})

Contested PROD, concern was "Non-notable list written in an innapropriate tone." Cloudz 679 20:28, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Delete: Redundant to Garhwali people#Garwali Brahmin Clans with no claim that the Brahmin clans as a group are notable enough for a list or their own article. — Bility (talk) 21:11, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:05, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:05, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bryce (talk | contribs) 01:22, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 00:13, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Delete article is pure OR combined with speculation and guesswork, no sources even hinted at. There is essentially nothing that could usefully be merged to Garhwali people#Garwali Brahmin Clans which itself is very lightly sourced, so delete is the only option. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:55, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.