Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disc2day

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:45, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

=[[Disc2day]]=

:{{la|Disc2day}} ([{{fullurl:Disc2day|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disc2day}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Non-notable disc replication company. Reads like an advert. Tempshill (talk) 01:46, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 01:48, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Speedy Delete If phrases like "Disc2day takes pride in being one of the most efficient and effective facilities in the digital media world" don't qualify as blatant spam, I'm not sure what does. Fifty dollars says this is also a copyright violation. - 2 ... says you, says me 04:17, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Comment I've declined the spam speedy, and taken out that line. If you can find the coyvio it's violating (and I suspect yuo're right) re-tag. Thanks. Ged UK 08:15, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Even wthout that line, it's still blatant advertising. Niteshift36 (talk) 08:49, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.